Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B ; (12): 570-574, 2007.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-277362

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The purpose of this work was to investigate the distribution pattern of fibrinolytic factors and their inhibitors in rabbit tissues.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The components of the fibrinolytic system in extracts from a variety of rabbit tissues, including tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), plasminogen (Plg), plasmin (Pl) and alpha(2) plasmin inhibitor (alpha(2)PI), were determined by colorimetric assay.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The tissue extracts in renal, small intestine, lung, brain and spleen demonstrated strong fibrinolytic function, in which high activity of tPA, Plg and Pl was manifested; whereas in skeletal muscle, tongue and stomach, higher activity of PAI-1 and alpha(2)PI showed obviously. Also excellent linear correlations were found between levels of tPA and PAI-1, Pl and alpha(2)PI, Plg and Pl. In related tissues, renal cortex and renal marrow showed distinctly higher activity of tPA and lower activity of PAI-1, with the levels of Plg and Pl in renal cortex being higher than those in renal marrow, where the alpha(2)PI level was higher than that in renal cortex. Similarly, the levels of tPA, Plg and Pl in small intestine were higher than those in large intestine, but with respect to PAI-1 and alpha(2)PI, the matter was reverse. In addition, the fibrinolytic activity in muscle tissue was lower, however, the levels of tPA, Plg, and Pl in cardiac muscle were obviously higher than those in skeletal muscles, and the levels of PAI-1 and alpha(2)PI were significantly lower than those in skeletal muscle.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our data demonstrate that a remarkable difference of the fibrinolytic patterns exists in rabbit tissues, which has probable profound significance in understanding the relationship between the function of haemostasis or thrombosis and the physiologic function in tissues.</p>


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Male , Rabbits , Fibrinolysin , Metabolism , Fibrinolysis , Gastric Mucosa , Metabolism , Gastrointestinal Tract , Metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa , Metabolism , Organ Specificity , Plasminogen , Metabolism , Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 , Metabolism , Tissue Extracts , Metabolism , Tissue Plasminogen Activator , Metabolism , alpha-2-Antiplasmin , Metabolism
2.
Chinese Journal of Oncology ; (12): 753-757, 2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-316309

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To detect the serum proteomic patterns by using SELDI-TOF-MS and CM10 ProteinChip techniques in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and to evaluate the significance of the proteomic patterns in colorectal cancer staging.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 76 serum samples were obtained from CRC patients at different clinical stages, including Dukes A (n = 10), Dukes B (n = 19), Dukes C (n = 16) and Dukes D (n = 31). Different stage models were developed and validated by bioinformatics methods of support vector machines, discriminant analysis and time-sequence analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The model I formed by six proteins of peaks at m/z 2759.6, 2964.7, 2048.0, 4795.9, 4139.8 and 37 761.6 could do the best as potential biomarkers to distinguish local CRC patients (Dukes A and Dukes B) from regional CRC patients (Dukes C ) with an accuracy of 86.7%. The model II formed by 3 proteins of peaks at m/z 6885.3, 2058.3 and 8567.8 could do the best to distinguish locoregional CRC patients (Dukes A, B and C) from systematic CRC patients (Dukes D) with an accuracy of 75.0%. The mode III could distinguish Dukes A from Dukes B with an accuracy of 86.2% (25/29). The model IV could distinguish Dukes A from Dukes C with an accuracy of 84.6% (22/26). The model V could distinguish Dukes B from Dukes C with an accuracy of 85.7% (30/35). The model VI could distinguish Dukes B from Dukes D with an accuracy of 80.0% (40/50). The model VII could distinguish Dukes C from Dukes D with an accuracy of 78.7% (37/47). Different stage groups could be distinguished by the two-dimensional scattered spots figure obviously.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our findings indicate that this method can well be used in preoperative staging of colorectal cancers and the screened tumor markers may serve for guidance of integrating treatment of colorectal cancers.</p>


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Blood , Colorectal Neoplasms , Blood , Pathology , Neoplasm Proteins , Blood , Neoplasm Staging , Methods , Preoperative Care , Protein Array Analysis , Methods , Proteomics , Methods , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Methods
3.
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B ; (12): 235-240, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-251932

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVES</b>To detect the serum proteomic patterns by using SELDI-TOF-MS (surface enhanced laser desorption/ ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry) technology and CM10 ProteinChip in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and to evaluate the significance of the proteomic patterns in the tumour staging of colorectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>SELDI-TOF-MS and CM10 ProteinChip were used to detect the serum proteomic patterns of 76 patients with colorectal cancer, among them, 10 Stage I, 19 Stage II, 16 Stage III and 31 Stage IV samples. Different stage models were developed and validated by support vector machines, discriminant analysis and time-sequence analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The Model I formed by 6 protein peaks (m/z: 2759.58, 2964.66, 2048.01, 4795.90, 4139.77 and 37761.60) could be used to distinguish local CRC patients (Stage I and Stage II) from regional CRC patients (Stage III) with an accuracy of 86.67% (39/45). The Model II formed by 3 protein peaks (m/z: 6885.30, 2058.32 and 8567.75) could be used to distinguish locoregional CRC patients (Stage I, Stage II and Stage III) from systematic CRC patients (Stage IV) with an accuracy of 75.00% (57/76). The Model III could distinguish Stage I from Stage II with an accuracy of 86.21% (25/29). The Model IV could distinguish Stage I from Stage III with accuracy of 84.62% (22/26). The Model V could distinguish Stage II from Stage III with accuracy of 85.71% (30/35). The Model VI could distinguish Stage II from Stage IV with accuracy of 80.00% (40/50). The Model VII could distinguish Stage III from Stage IV with accuracy of 78.72% (37/47). Different stage groups could be distinguished by the two-dimensional scattered spots figure obviously.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>This method showed great success in preoperatively determining the colorectal cancer stage of patients.</p>


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Blood , Colorectal Neoplasms , Blood , Diagnosis , Pathology , General Surgery , Gene Expression Profiling , Methods , Neoplasm Proteins , Blood , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care , Methods , Protein Array Analysis , Methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL